STOP
CONTAMINATION
on STETHOSCOPES !
Stethoscopes: a potential vector of infection?
Jones JS,Hoerle D,Riekse R.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterworth Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, USA.
Ann Emerg Med.1995 Sep;26(3):296-9.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To survey emergency care providers about their stethoscope-cleaning measures and to determine the correlation between these measures and the extent of Staphylococcus carriage. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: University-affiliated community hospital ED. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty health care providers, comprising emergency medicine house staff and attending physicians (n = 50), ED nurses (n = 50), and prehospital personnel working in Kent County, Michigan (n = 50).
INTERVENTIONS: Providers were asked how often they cleaned their stethoscopes and which cleaning agents were used. We then cultured each stethoscope by pressing the diaphragm on mannitol agar and incubating the culture aerobically for 48 hours. Staphylococcus aureus was identified by means of standard measures. We examined the effects of different cleaning agents on 24 stethoscopes. The numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) before and after cleaning with alcohol, nonionic detergent, and antiseptic soap were noted.
RESULTS: Overall, 48% of health care providers (74 of 150) cleaned their stethoscopes daily or weekly, 37% monthly, and 7% yearly; and 7% had never cleaned their stethoscopes. No significant differences were found in the hygiene routines of the three groups of providers surveyed. Use of an alcohol swab was the preferred method of cleaning. One hundred thirty-three stethoscopes (89%) grew staphylococci; 25 (19%) yielded S aureus. Mean staphylococcal bacterial counts ( +/- SD) were 52 +/- 78 CFUs per stethoscope among physicians, 46 +/- 92 CFUs among emergency medical service personnel, and 13 +/- 21 CFUs from the nursing staff (ANOVA, P = .01). Cleaning the stethoscope diaphragm resulted in immediate reduction in the bacterial count: by 94% with alcohol swabs, 90% with nonionic detergent, and 75% with antiseptic soap.
CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that stethoscopes used in emergency practice are often contaminated with staphylococci and are therefore a potential vector of infection. This contamination is greatly reduced by frequent cleaning with alcohol or nonionic detergent.
_________________________________________
Taux de contamination des stéthoscopes en mileu hospitalier
Genne, De Torrente, Humaire, Siegrist
in Scheizerische medeziniche Wochenschrift Vol 126, An 1996, Fasc 51-52
Level of stethoscope contamination in a hospital environment
Genné D, de Torrenté A, Humair L, Siegrist HH
Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1996; 126:2237–2240.
Stethoscopes: A Potential Source of Nosocomial Infections
Francis Marie C. Africa-Purino, Emmanuel Edwin R. Dy, Remedios F. Coronel
Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Santo Tomas University Hospital, Espana, Manila
Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 29(2):9-13
Stethoscopes: a potential vector of infection?
Jones JS,Hoerle D,Riekse R.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterworth Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, USA.
Ann Emerg Med.1995 Sep;26(3):296-9.
The stethoscope in the Emergency Department: a vector of infection?
Núñez S ,Moreno A , Green K, Villar J.
Department of Emergency, Hospital de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Epidemiol Infect. 2000 Apr;124(2):233-7.
The stethoscope as a vector of infectious diseases in the paediatric division.
Youngster I , Berkovitch M , Heyman E, Lazarovitch Z, Goldman M.
Division of Paediatrics, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Sep;97(9):1253-5. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes with antimicrobial diaphragm covers.
Wood MW, Lund RC, Stevenson KB.
Respiratory Therapy Department, Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID 83706, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 May;35(4):263-6.
The stethoscope. A potential source of nosocomial infection?
Marinella MA, Pierson C, Chenoweth C.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Apr 14;157(7):786-90.
Stéthoscopes et thermomètres, sources d’infection ?
Hj. Furrer, Berne, et P. Francioli, Lausanne
Swiss-NOSO 1995; Volume 2, Numéro 4.
Stethoscope contamination in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Wright IM, Orr H, Porter C.
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 1995 Jan;29(1):65-8.
Quelle est la prévalence des infections
nosocomiales ?
DONNEES EPIDEMIOLOGIQUES EN FRANCE.
EXTRAITS DU RAPPORT OPEPS, JUIN 2006
Alain Vasselle.
Plan stratégique national de
prévention des infections associées aux soins
Conférence de presse Paris le 21 janvier 2009.
BACHELOT-NARQUIN Roselyne Ministre de la santé et des sports.
Les risques d’infections nosocomiales associés à l’utilisation du matériel
électronique pour l’inscription des données cliniques au chevet du patient
Chantale Simard, inf., M.A.P. coordonnatrice administrative des activités d’ETMIS